Airfoil Data
GOE256

GOE 256 (JUNKERS E) AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
12.59%
Max Camber
6.29%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

GOE256

GOE 256 (JUNKERS E) AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
12.59%
Max Camber
6.29%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The GOE 256 (JUNKERS E) AIRFOIL is a 12.6% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 6.3% at 40% chord, suited to high-lift UAV wings, RC sailplanes, and low-Reynolds-number slow-flyers. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -6.3°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 11.4° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 70 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The 13% thickness provides structural depth for main-spar placement without excessive drag penalty at moderate speeds.

The GOE256 appears in the wing design of at least 7 documented aircraft, including designs from Junkers and Mitsubishi. Its proven track record across conventional and rotorcraft designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the GOE256 typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: ONERA HOR20 AIRFOIL, AH 93-W-174, GOE 505 AIRFOIL, GOE 776 AIRFOIL, GOE 681 AIRFOIL. The E214 (11.1%) is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the GOE256 Airfoil

Aircraft
7
Manufacturers
2
Tapered wings
0
Top manufacturer
Junkers
7 aircraft
Junkers J1
Junkers
Goettingen 256 ?Constant
Junkers J2
Junkers
Goettingen 256 ?Constant
Junkers J4
Junkers
Goettingen 256 ?Constant
Junkers J9
Junkers
Goettingen 256 ?Constant
Junkers Ju 46
Junkers
Goettingen 256 ?Constant
Junkers R42
Junkers
Goettingen 256 ?Constant
Mitsubishi Ki-2
Mitsubishi
Goettingen 256 ?Constant

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the GOE256 frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (12.6%) and max camber (6.3%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...