Airfoil Data
FX71L150

FX 71-L-150/30 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
7.50%
Max Camber
3.75%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

FX71L150

FX 71-L-150/30 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
7.50%
Max Camber
3.75%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The FX 71-L-150/30 AIRFOIL is a thin 7.5% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 3.8% at 34% chord, suited to high-speed UAVs, sailplane tip sections, and propeller blade design. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -3.8°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 11.8° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 56 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The slim profile minimises pressure drag at higher speeds but leaves limited spar depth for structural integration.

The FX71L150 appears in the wing design of at least 3 documented aircraft, including designs from Akaflieg and Celair. Its proven track record across canard designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the FX71L150 typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: NACA 16-015, E475 (15.01%), FX 71-L-150/30 AIRFOIL, D.G.A. 1138, GOE 767 AIRFOIL. The FX 71-L-150/25 AIRFOIL is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the FX71L150 Airfoil

Aircraft
3
Manufacturers
3
Tapered wings
0
Top manufacturer
Akaflieg
3 aircraft
Akaflieg Munchen Mu 28
Akaflieg
Wortmann FX 71-L-150/20Constant
Celair GA-1 Celstar
Celair
Wortmann FX 71-L-150/25Constant
Steinleher/Huber SH-2H
Steinleher/Huber
Wortmann FX 71-L-150/20Constant

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the FX71L150 frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (7.5%) and max camber (3.8%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...