Airfoil Data
FX73170

FX 73-170

Max Thickness
12.81%
Max Camber
6.40%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

FX73170

FX 73-170

Max Thickness
12.81%
Max Camber
6.40%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The FX 73-170 is a 12.8% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 6.4% at 43% chord, suited to high-lift UAV wings, RC sailplanes, and low-Reynolds-number slow-flyers. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -6.4°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 11.3° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 70 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The 13% thickness provides structural depth for main-spar placement without excessive drag penalty at moderate speeds.

The FX73170 appears in the wing design of at least 1 documented aircraft — notably by Akaflieg. Its proven track record across canard designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the FX73170 typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: GOE 13K AIRFOIL, EPPLER 1098 AIRFOIL, GOE 498 AIRFOIL, EPPLER 584 AIRFOIL, EPPLER 603 AIRFOIL. The Prandtl-D Wingtip NASA TP-2016-219072 is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the FX73170 Airfoil

Aircraft
1
Manufacturers
1
Tapered wings
1
Top manufacturer
Akaflieg
1 aircraft
Akaflieg Stuttgart FS-29 TF
Akaflieg
Wortmann FX 73-170Wortmann FX 73-K-170/22

Wing lofting: 1 of these aircraft taper from FX73170 at the root to a different tip section. Use the Tapered filter to isolate them, then click any tip airfoil link to compare geometries.

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the FX73170 frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (12.8%) and max camber (6.4%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...