Airfoil Data
E655

EPPLER 655 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
12.63%
Max Camber
6.32%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

E655

EPPLER 655 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
12.63%
Max Camber
6.32%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The EPPLER 655 AIRFOIL is a 12.6% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 6.3% at 41% chord, suited to high-lift UAV wings, RC sailplanes, and low-Reynolds-number slow-flyers. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -6.3°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 11.4° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 70 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The 13% thickness provides structural depth for main-spar placement without excessive drag penalty at moderate speeds.

The E655 appears in the wing design of at least 1 documented aircraft — notably by Bagalini. Its proven track record across canard designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the E655 typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: NACA 65(4)-421, GW 27, GOE 506 AIRFOIL, EPPLER 678 AIRFOIL, AH 93-W-174. The EPPLER 342 AIRFOIL is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the E655 Airfoil

Aircraft
1
Manufacturers
1
Tapered wings
1
Top manufacturer
Bagalini
1 aircraft
Bagalini Baga 68
Bagalini
Eppler 604Eppler 655

Wing lofting: 1 of these aircraft taper from E655 at the root to a different tip section. Use the Tapered filter to isolate them, then click any tip airfoil link to compare geometries.

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the E655 frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (12.6%) and max camber (6.3%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...