Airfoil Data
GOE527

GOE 527 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
13.94%
Max Camber
6.97%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

GOE527

GOE 527 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
13.94%
Max Camber
6.97%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The GOE 527 AIRFOIL is a 13.9% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 7.0% at 29% chord, suited to high-lift UAV wings, RC sailplanes, and low-Reynolds-number slow-flyers. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -7.0°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 10.9° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 71 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The 14% thickness provides structural depth for main-spar placement without excessive drag penalty at moderate speeds.

The GOE527 appears in the wing design of at least 3 documented aircraft, including designs from Akaflieg and Avia. Its proven track record across conventional and rotorcraft designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the GOE527 typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: GOE 711 AIRFOIL, RAF 89 AIRFOIL, GOE 226 (MVA H.36) AIRFOIL, Dayton-Wright 6, FX 76-MP-160. The DAE-51 AIRFOIL is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the GOE527 Airfoil

Aircraft
3
Manufacturers
3
Tapered wings
3
Top manufacturer
Akaflieg
3 aircraft
Akaflieg Stuttgart F.1
Akaflieg
Goettingen 535Goettingen 527
Avia 41P
Avia
Goettingen 535Goettingen 527
Klemm L20
Klemm
Goettingen 527Goettingen 529

Wing lofting: 3 of these aircraft taper from GOE527 at the root to a different tip section. Use the Tapered filter to isolate them, then click any tip airfoil link to compare geometries.

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the GOE527 frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (13.9%) and max camber (7.0%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...