Airfoil Data
GOE593

GOE 593 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
9.90%
Max Camber
4.95%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

GOE593

GOE 593 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
9.90%
Max Camber
4.95%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The GOE 593 AIRFOIL is a 9.9% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 5.0% at 40% chord, suited to general-aviation and UAV wing design. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -5.0°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 11.7° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 63 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The slim profile minimises pressure drag at higher speeds but leaves limited spar depth for structural integration.

The GOE593 appears in the wing design of at least 5 documented aircraft, including designs from Curtiss-Wright and Day. Its proven track record across canard designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the GOE593 typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: DORNIER A-5 AIRFOIL, MB253515 15.0% smoothed, GEMINI (smoothed), LISSAMAN 7769 AIRFOIL, GOE 746 AIRFOIL. The FX 69-274 is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the GOE593 Airfoil

Aircraft
5
Manufacturers
3
Tapered wings
0
Top manufacturer
Curtiss-Wright
5 aircraft
Curtiss-Wright CW-15C Sedan
Curtiss-Wright
Goettingen 593Constant
Curtiss-Wright CW-15D Sedan
Curtiss-Wright
Goettingen 593Constant
Curtiss-Wright CW-15N Sedan
Curtiss-Wright
Goettingen 593Constant
Day Errant
Day
Goettingen 593Constant
Travel Air 10-D
Travel
Goettingen 593Constant

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the GOE593 frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (9.9%) and max camber (5.0%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...