Airfoil Data
HQ17

HORSTMANN AND QUAST HQ-17/14.38 AIRFOIL (MEASURED)

Max Thickness
12.12%
Max Camber
6.06%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

HQ17

HORSTMANN AND QUAST HQ-17/14.38 AIRFOIL (MEASURED)

Max Thickness
12.12%
Max Camber
6.06%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The HORSTMANN AND QUAST HQ-17/14.38 AIRFOIL (MEASURED) is a 12.1% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 6.1% at 44% chord, suited to high-lift UAV wings, RC sailplanes, and low-Reynolds-number slow-flyers. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -6.1°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 11.6° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 69 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The 12% thickness provides structural depth for main-spar placement without excessive drag penalty at moderate speeds.

The HQ17 appears in the wing design of at least 1 documented aircraft — notably by Binder. Its proven track record across canard designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the HQ17 typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: GOE 332 (PFALZ 61) AIRFOIL, WORTMANN FX 77-W-153 AIRFOIL, GOE 621 AIRFOIL, GOE 612 AIRFOIL, EPPLER 399 AIRFOIL. The HQ 3.5/13 AIRFOIL is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the HQ17 Airfoil

Aircraft
1
Manufacturers
1
Tapered wings
1
Top manufacturer
Binder
1 aircraft
Binder EB-29
Binder
DFVLR HQ 17Delft DU 84-132/V3

Wing lofting: 1 of these aircraft taper from HQ17 at the root to a different tip section. Use the Tapered filter to isolate them, then click any tip airfoil link to compare geometries.

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the HQ17 frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (12.1%) and max camber (6.1%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...