Airfoil Data
N63212
NACA 63-212 AIRFOIL
Wing Geometry Simulator
The NACA 63-212 AIRFOIL is a thin 7.0% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 3.5% at 35% chord, suited to high-speed UAVs, sailplane tip sections, and propeller blade design. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -3.5°.
Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 11.8° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 55 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The slim profile minimises pressure drag at higher speeds but leaves limited spar depth for structural integration.
The N63212 appears in the wing design of at least 11 documented aircraft, including designs from FMA and DaeWoo. Its proven track record across conventional and rotorcraft designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.
Designers evaluating the N63212 typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: LOCKHEED C-141 BL761.11 AIRFOIL, ESA40, NASA SC(2)-0414 AIRFOIL, SD6060-104-88, GOE 377 AIRFOIL. The NACA 64(4)-221 is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.
Aircraft Using the N63212 Airfoil
DaeWoo KTX-1 Woong-Bee | DaeWoo | NACA 63-218 | NACA 63-212 |
FMA IA 35 Huanquero | FMA | NACA 63-218 | NACA 63-212 |
FMA IA 35 Pandora | FMA | NACA 63-218 | NACA 63-212 |
FMA IA 50 Guarni I | FMA | NACA 63-218 | NACA 63-212 |
FMA IA 50 Guarni II | FMA | NACA 63-218 | NACA 63-212 |
Korea Aerospace Industries KT-1 Woong-Bee | Korea | NACA 63-218 | NACA 63-212 |
Osprey Pereira GP4 | Osprey | NACA 63-212 | Constant |
Procaer F.400 Cobra | Procaer | NACA 64-216 | NACA 63-212 |
Sandberg/Boland Tsunami | Sandberg/Boland | NACA 63-212 | Constant |
Terrill HLT-101 | Terrill | NACA 62-211 | NACA 63-212 |
Viper Aircraft ViperJet | Viper | NACA 63-215 | NACA 63-212 |
Wing lofting: 9 of these aircraft taper from N63212 at the root to a different tip section. Use the Tapered filter to isolate them, then click any tip airfoil link to compare geometries.
Related Airfoils
Engineers evaluating the N63212 frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (7.0%) and max camber (3.5%).