Airfoil Data
N63010A

NACA 63A010 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
5.00%
Max Camber
2.50%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

N63010A

NACA 63A010 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
5.00%
Max Camber
2.50%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The NACA 63A010 AIRFOIL is a thin 5.0% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 2.5% at 35% chord, suited to high-speed UAVs, sailplane tip sections, and propeller blade design. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -2.5°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 12.0° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 49 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The slim profile minimises pressure drag at higher speeds but leaves limited spar depth for structural integration.

The N63010A appears in the wing design of at least 1 documented aircraft — notably by Douglas. Its proven track record across canard designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the N63010A typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: NACA 64A-010 10.0%, LWK 79-100, RAE 101 AIRFOIL, RAE 100 AIRFOIL, RAE 103 AIRFOIL. The NACA 63(4)-421 is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the N63010A Airfoil

Aircraft
1
Manufacturers
1
Tapered wings
1
Top manufacturer
Douglas
1 aircraft
Douglas D-558-II Skyrocket
Douglas
NACA 63-010NACA 63-012

Wing lofting: 1 of these aircraft taper from N63010A at the root to a different tip section. Use the Tapered filter to isolate them, then click any tip airfoil link to compare geometries.

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the N63010A frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (5.0%) and max camber (2.5%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...