Airfoil Data
NACA63206

NACA 63-206

Max Thickness
4.04%
Max Camber
2.02%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

NACA63206

NACA 63-206

Max Thickness
4.04%
Max Camber
2.02%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The NACA 63-206 is a thin 4.0% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 2.0% at 40% chord, suited to high-speed UAVs, sailplane tip sections, and propeller blade design. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -2.0°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 12.0° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 47 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The slim profile minimises pressure drag at higher speeds but leaves limited spar depth for structural integration.

The NACA63206 appears in the wing design of at least 2 documented aircraft, including designs from Composites and Dean. Its proven track record across canard designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the NACA63206 typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: LWK 80-080, NACA M2, HQ 0/9 AIRFOIL, FX 77-080, NACA 64-206. The NACA M14 AIRFOIL is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the NACA63206 Airfoil

Aircraft
2
Manufacturers
2
Tapered wings
1
Top manufacturer
Composites
2 aircraft
Composites Engineering BQM-167 Skeeter
Composites
NACA 63-210NACA 63-206
Dean Delt-Air 250
Dean
NACA 63-206 modConstant

Wing lofting: 1 of these aircraft taper from NACA63206 at the root to a different tip section. Use the Tapered filter to isolate them, then click any tip airfoil link to compare geometries.

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the NACA63206 frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (4.0%) and max camber (2.0%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...