Airfoil Data
DAVIS

Davis AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
9.15%
Max Camber
4.58%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

DAVIS

Davis AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
9.15%
Max Camber
4.58%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The Davis AIRFOIL is a 9.2% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 4.6% at 40% chord, suited to general-aviation and UAV wing design. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -4.6°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 11.7° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 61 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The slim profile minimises pressure drag at higher speeds but leaves limited spar depth for structural integration.

The DAVIS appears in the wing design of at least 21 documented aircraft, including designs from Consolidated and North American. Its proven track record across conventional and rotorcraft designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the DAVIS typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: GOE 804 (EA 8) AIRFOIL, EPPLER 67 AIRFOIL, CLARK V AIRFOIL, FX 83-W-108, BOEING-VERTOL VR-7 AIRFOIL WITH TAB. The GOE 685 AIRFOIL is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the DAVIS Airfoil

Aircraft
21
Manufacturers
5
Tapered wings
18
Top manufacturer
Consolidated
21 aircraft · page 1 of 2
Consolidated 31 XP4Y Corregidor
Consolidated
DavisConstant
Consolidated 32 AT-22
Consolidated
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
Consolidated 32 B-24 Liberator
Consolidated
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
Consolidated 32 B-41 Liberator
Consolidated
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
Consolidated 32 C-109
Consolidated
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
Consolidated 32 C-87
Consolidated
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
Consolidated 32 F-9
Consolidated
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
Consolidated 32 LB-30 Liberator
Consolidated
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
Consolidated 32 PB4Y Privateer
Consolidated
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
Consolidated 33 XB-32 Dominator
Consolidated
DavisConstant
Consolidated 34 B-32 Dominator
Consolidated
DavisConstant
Consolidated 39 R2Y-1
Consolidated
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
Consolidated 40 RY-1
Consolidated
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
Consolidated 40 RY-3
Consolidated
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
Convair 104 R2Y
Convair
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
Douglas B-24-DT Liberator
Douglas
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
Ford B-24-FO Liberator
Ford
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
North American Aviation NA-118 B-24G-NT Liberator
North American
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
North American Aviation NA-125 B-24G-NT Liberator
North American
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)
North American Aviation NA-95 B-24G-NT Liberator
North American
Davis (22%)Davis (9.3%)

Wing lofting: 18 of these aircraft taper from DAVIS at the root to a different tip section. Use the Tapered filter to isolate them, then click any tip airfoil link to compare geometries.

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the DAVIS frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (9.2%) and max camber (4.6%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...