Airfoil Data
GOE654

GOE 654 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
12.40%
Max Camber
6.20%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

GOE654

GOE 654 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
12.40%
Max Camber
6.20%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The GOE 654 AIRFOIL is a 12.4% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 6.2% at 30% chord, suited to high-lift UAV wings, RC sailplanes, and low-Reynolds-number slow-flyers. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -6.2°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 11.5° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 69 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The 12% thickness provides structural depth for main-spar placement without excessive drag penalty at moderate speeds.

The GOE654 appears in the wing design of at least 1 documented aircraft — notably by Caudron. Its proven track record across canard designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the GOE654 typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: EPPLER 657 AIRFOIL, EPPLER 587 AIRFOIL, RONCZ 1082 VOYAGER ROOT OUTER AFT WING AIRFOIL, GOE 425 AIRFOIL, NACA M18. The AG53 is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the GOE654 Airfoil

Aircraft
1
Manufacturers
1
Tapered wings
1
Top manufacturer
Caudron
1 aircraft
Caudron C.800
Caudron
Goettingen 654Goettingen 676

Wing lofting: 1 of these aircraft taper from GOE654 at the root to a different tip section. Use the Tapered filter to isolate them, then click any tip airfoil link to compare geometries.

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the GOE654 frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (12.4%) and max camber (6.2%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...