Airfoil Data
R1046

RONCZ 1046 VOYAGER CANARD AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
15.67%
Max Camber
7.83%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

R1046

RONCZ 1046 VOYAGER CANARD AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
15.67%
Max Camber
7.83%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The RONCZ 1046 VOYAGER CANARD AIRFOIL is a thick 15.7% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 7.8% at 40% chord, suited to high-lift UAV wings, RC sailplanes, and low-Reynolds-number slow-flyers. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -7.8°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 10.3° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 73 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The 16% thickness provides structural depth for main-spar placement without excessive drag penalty at moderate speeds.

The R1046 appears in the wing design of at least 1 documented aircraft — notably by Rutan. Its proven track record across canard designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the R1046 typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: GOE 522 AIRFOIL, USA 31 AIRFOIL, NACA 4424, EPPLER 421 AIRFOIL, GOE 434 AIRFOIL. The GOE 118 (MVA MK.7) AIRFOIL is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the R1046 Airfoil

Aircraft
1
Manufacturers
1
Tapered wings
1
Top manufacturer
Rutan
1 aircraft
Rutan 76 Voyager
Rutan
Roncz 1046Roncz 1080/1082/1082T

Wing lofting: 1 of these aircraft taper from R1046 at the root to a different tip section. Use the Tapered filter to isolate them, then click any tip airfoil link to compare geometries.

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the R1046 frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (15.7%) and max camber (7.8%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...