Airfoil Data
DAI1336

DAI 1336

Max Thickness
12.35%
Max Camber
6.17%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

DAI1336

DAI 1336

Max Thickness
12.35%
Max Camber
6.17%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The DAI 1336 is a 12.3% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 6.2% at 38% chord, suited to high-lift UAV wings, RC sailplanes, and low-Reynolds-number slow-flyers. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -6.2°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 11.5° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 69 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The 12% thickness provides structural depth for main-spar placement without excessive drag penalty at moderate speeds.

The DAI1336 appears in the wing design of at least 1 documented aircraft — notably by MIT. Its proven track record across rotorcraft designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the DAI1336 typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: GOE 320 (HANSA-BRANDENBURG II.1) AIRFOIL, HQ 3.5/18 AIRFOIL, EPPLER 435 AIRFOIL, CLARK YM-18 AIRFOIL, FX 66-S-171 AIRFOIL. The UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA UA 79-SF-187 AIRFOIL is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the DAI1336 Airfoil

Aircraft
1
Manufacturers
1
Tapered wings
1
Top manufacturer
MIT
1 aircraft
MIT Light Eagle
MIT
Drela DAI 1335Drela DAI 1336/1238

Wing lofting: 1 of these aircraft taper from DAI1336 at the root to a different tip section. Use the Tapered filter to isolate them, then click any tip airfoil link to compare geometries.

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the DAI1336 frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (12.3%) and max camber (6.2%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...