Airfoil Data
GOE429

GOE 429 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
5.69%
Max Camber
2.84%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Click to expand

Airfoil Geometry

GOE429

GOE 429 AIRFOIL

Max Thickness
5.69%
Max Camber
2.84%
0.15 0.05 -0.05 -0.15
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Chord (x/c)
Profile
Camber line
Chord line

Press Esc or click outside to close

Wing Geometry Simulator

Live Geometry
Aspect Ratio 3.33
Area (S) 0.300
MAC 0.311m
Taper (λ) 0.50
Params

The GOE 429 AIRFOIL is a thin 5.7% chord-thickness airfoil with a maximum camber of 2.8% at 30% chord, suited to high-speed UAVs, sailplane tip sections, and propeller blade design. At zero angle of attack the cambered geometry generates positive lift, giving an estimated zero-lift angle of -2.8°.

Thin airfoil theory predicts a stall angle near 11.9° and a peak lift-to-drag ratio around 51 at typical UAV and light-aircraft Reynolds numbers — useful benchmarks before running a full XFOIL or NeuralFoil polar. The slim profile minimises pressure drag at higher speeds but leaves limited spar depth for structural integration.

The GOE429 appears in the wing design of at least 7 documented aircraft, including designs from Kellett and Cierva. Its proven track record across conventional and rotorcraft designs makes it one of the more field-validated profiles in the UIUC database.

Designers evaluating the GOE429 typically compare it against profiles of similar thickness: EPPLER 297 AIRFOIL, GIII BL369 AIRFOIL, S2060 8%, HQ 1.5/8.5 AIRFOIL, S2050 8.93%. The GOE 513 AIRFOIL is another reference profile frequently considered alongside it.

Aircraft Using the GOE429 Airfoil

Aircraft
7
Manufacturers
5
Tapered wings
0
Top manufacturer
Kellett
7 aircraft
Cierva C-4 (later)
Cierva
Goettingen 429Constant
Kellett K-2
Kellett
Goettingen 429Constant
Kellett K-3
Kellett
Goettingen 429Constant
Kellett K-4
Kellett
Goettingen 429Constant
Pitcairn-Cierva PCA-2
Pitcairn-Cierva
Goettingen 429Constant
TsAGI A-4
TsAGI
Goettingen 429Constant
Wilford Gyroplane (original)
Wilford
Goettingen 429Constant

Related Airfoils

Engineers evaluating the GOE429 frequently compare it against profiles with comparable geometric constraints. Below are the closest matches based on maximum thickness (5.7%) and max camber (2.8%).

Similar by Camber
Loading calendar...